See that in case the personal risk (q) understands the bonus regarding contract gets 0. Next precisely the impacted debtors often pay back early, if your ex article interest stays higher. In happening off a reducing interest rate all the debtors will pay-off early. Men and women having just who the benefit about bargain stays b will pay early or take upwards a separate credit on a lower interest. The others, having whom the private chance possess know will repay very early. For them the acquire regarding the price will be 0.

They reinvests the brand new paid off mortgage in one interest rate as the credit rate

In the model a risk premium exists only for the first credit and not for the second credit. If the debtor takes up the second credit at the low interest rate ( \(_<2l>)\) the interest rate cannot-by assumption-decline any more in future. The bank cannot impose a risk premium on the second credit, because the bank has no damage if the second credit is also prematurely repaid. In the real world it would however recover its handling costs, which are in the model assumed to be 0. This assumption avoids an infinite regress for the calculation of the risk premium without affecting the main point of the analysis. Otherwise, the calculation for the risk premium of the second contract would require the possibility of a third contract and so forth.

Now assume that the first credit is taken up not in the high interest period but in a low interest period \(_<1>=_<1,l>\) . In that case the future, post contractual interest rate can by assumption not further decline. It is either unchanged or higher. Therefore, in this case the only risk of the bank is that the personal risk q realizes. But a damage cannot occur, because an early repayment allows the bank to either invest the money at the same rate or at an even higher rate. We can therefore exclude this case from further consideration. The expected gain of the debtor from the contract is then

In case the risk advanced is roofed explicitly, we have on the expected get from a cards contract, that was ended while in the a leading attention several months

This constellation on the model, where in actuality the premature cost out of credit grounds zero injuries and you can for that reason zero interest mark-up is not after that thought within the here analysis.

If the legal remedy for early repayment is expectation damages the damage from early repayment is the difference between the contractual and the post-contractual interest rate \(_<1>-_<2>\) . The bank can invest the repaid money at an interest rate of \(_<2>\) . It can, for instance, buy mortgage bonds on the secondary age payment results if and only if \(_<1>>_<2>\) . Otherwise the differential method of damage calculation results in a damage award of zero. The compensation payment is therefore

Let us now assume that after the conclusion of the contract the market interest rate falls, but the benefit from the contract remains at b. loans Paragon Estates CO We get an outcome which is different in comparison with the result under a right of premature repayment. The debtor wants to end the contract and take out a new mortgage at the low interest rate. With expectation damages as remedy for breach of contract her gain would be \((b-_<2>)-\left( _<1>-_<2>\right)=b-_<1>\) . The term in the first bracket is the consumer’s gain from the new mortgage contract and the term in the second bracket denotes the amount of damages to be paid. The early repayment motivated by the lower interest rate does not result in a gain that is higher than the gain from performance of the contract as originally concluded. Therefore, no early repayment results for taking up a new credit if interest rates decrease after contract formation (Table 2).